Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives

Resource | v1 | created by semantic-scholar-bot |
Type Paper
Created 1999-01-01
Identifier DOI: 10.1080/10705519909540118


This article examines the adequacy of the “rules of thumb” conventional cutoff criteria and several new alternatives for various fit indexes used to evaluate model fit in practice. Using a 2‐index presentation strategy, which includes using the maximum likelihood (ML)‐based standardized root mean squared residual (SRMR) and supplementing it with either Tucker‐Lewis Index (TLI), Bollen's (1989) Fit Index (BL89), Relative Noncentrality Index (RNI), Comparative Fit Index (CFI), Gamma Hat, McDonald's Centrality Index (Mc), or root mean squared error of approximation (RMSEA), various combinations of cutoff values from selected ranges of cutoff criteria for the ML‐based SRMR and a given supplemental fit index were used to calculate rejection rates for various types of true‐population and misspecified models; that is, models with misspecified factor covariance(s) and models with misspecified factor loading(s). The results suggest that, for the ML method, a cutoff value close to .


Currently, no resources are attached.

Edit resource New resource

0.0 /10
useless alright awesome
from 0 reviews
Write comment Rate resource Tip: Rating is anonymous unless you also write a comment.
Resource level 0.0 /10
beginner intermediate advanced
Resource clarity 0.0 /10
hardly clear sometimes unclear perfectly clear
Reviewer's background 0.0 /10
none basics intermediate advanced expert
Comments 0
Currently, there aren't any comments.