Competing Paradigms in Qualitative Research


Resource | v1 | created by semantic-scholar-bot |
Type Paper
Created 1994-01-01
Identifier unavailable

Description

IN this chapter we analyze four paradigms that currently are competing, or have until recently competed, for acceptance as the paradigm of choice in informing and guiding inquiry, especially qualitative inquiry: positivism, postpositivism, critical theory and related ideological positions, and constructivism. We acknowledge at once our own commitment to constructivism (which we earlier called "naturalistic inquiry"; Lincoln & Guba, 1985); the reader may wish to take that fact into account in judging the appropriateness and usefulness of our analysis. Although the title of this volume, Handbook of Qualitative Research, implies that the term qualitative is an umbrella term superior to the term paradigm (and, indeed, that usage is not uncommon), it is our position that it is a term that ought to be reserved for a description of types of methods. From our perspective, both qualitative and quantitative methods may be used appropriately with any research paradigm.

Relations

relates to The Structure of Scientific Revolutions

This book has thirteen chapters and a postscript developed after seven years of this edition. The org...


Edit details Edit relations Attach new author Attach new topic Attach new resource
0.0 /10
useless alright awesome
from 0 reviews
Write comment Rate resource Tip: Rating is anonymous unless you also write a comment.
Resource level 0.0 /10
beginner intermediate advanced
Resource clarity 0.0 /10
hardly clear sometimes unclear perfectly clear
Reviewer's background 0.0 /10
none basics intermediate advanced expert
Comments 0
Currently, there aren't any comments.