Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey.


Resource | v1 | created by semantic-scholar-bot |
Type Paper
Created 2004-01-01
Identifier DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae

Description

OBJECTIVE Although quality assessment is gaining increasing attention, there is still no consensus on how to define and grade postoperative complications. This shortcoming hampers comparison of outcome data among different centers and therapies and over time. PATIENTS AND METHODS A classification of complications published by one of the authors in 1992 was critically re-evaluated and modified to increase its accuracy and its acceptability in the surgical community. Modifications mainly focused on the manner of reporting life-threatening and permanently disabling complications. The new grading system still mostly relies on the therapy used to treat the complication. The classification was tested in a cohort of 6336 patients who underwent elective general surgery at our institution. The reproducibility and personal judgment of the classification were evaluated through an international survey with 2 questionnaires sent to 10 surgical centers worldwide.

Relations

relates to The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

A 36-item short-form (SF-36) was constructed to survey health status in the Medical Outcomes Study. T...


Edit details Edit relations Attach new author Attach new topic Attach new resource
0.0 /10
useless alright awesome
from 0 reviews
Write comment Rate resource Tip: Rating is anonymous unless you also write a comment.
Resource level 0.0 /10
beginner intermediate advanced
Resource clarity 0.0 /10
hardly clear sometimes unclear perfectly clear
Reviewer's background 0.0 /10
none basics intermediate advanced expert
Comments 0
Currently, there aren't any comments.