U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation

Resource | v1 | created by semantic-scholar-bot |
Type Paper
Created 2015-01-01
Identifier DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28


There is large consent that successful training of deep networks requires many thousand annotated training samples. In this paper, we present a network and training strategy that relies on the strong use of data augmentation to use the available annotated samples more efficiently. The architecture consists of a contracting path to capture context and a symmetric expanding path that enables precise localization. We show that such a network can be trained end-to-end from very few images and outperforms the prior best method (a sliding-window convolutional network) on the ISBI challenge for segmentation of neuronal structures in electron microscopic stacks. Using the same network trained on transmitted light microscopy images (phase contrast and DIC) we won the ISBI cell tracking challenge 2015 in these categories by a large margin. Moreover, the network is fast. Segmentation of a 512x512 image takes less than a second on a recent GPU.


is about Computer science

Computer science is the study of computation and information. Computer science deals with theory of c...

links to Caffe: Convolutional Architecture for Fast Feature Embedding

Caffe provides multimedia scientists and practitioners with a clean and modifiable framework for stat...

links to Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition

In this work we investigate the effect of the convolutional network depth on its accuracy in the larg...

links to ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks

We trained a large, deep convolutional neural network to classify the 1.2 million high-resolution ima...

Edit resource New resource

0.0 /10
useless alright awesome
from 0 reviews
Write comment Rate resource Tip: Rating is anonymous unless you also write a comment.
Resource level 0.0 /10
beginner intermediate advanced
Resource clarity 0.0 /10
hardly clear sometimes unclear perfectly clear
Reviewer's background 0.0 /10
none basics intermediate advanced expert
Comments 0
Currently, there aren't any comments.